<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On-page Search Engine Optimization Checklist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.futuresearches.com/on-page-search-engine-optimization-checklist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.futuresearches.com/on-page-search-engine-optimization-checklist/</link>
	<description>Catch up on Search Marketing, SEO,  Social Media, Web Design and upcoming trends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 09:14:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Amelie Griffiths</title>
		<link>http://www.futuresearches.com/on-page-search-engine-optimization-checklist/comment-page-1/#comment-1257</link>
		<dc:creator>Amelie Griffiths</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 16:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futuresearches.com/?p=183#comment-1257</guid>
		<description>website SEO is a very time consuming task,&quot;-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>website SEO is a very time consuming task,&#8221;-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Money Boy</title>
		<link>http://www.futuresearches.com/on-page-search-engine-optimization-checklist/comment-page-1/#comment-568</link>
		<dc:creator>Money Boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 04:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futuresearches.com/?p=183#comment-568</guid>
		<description>Super-Duper site! I am loving it!! Will come back again - taking you feeds also, Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Super-Duper site! I am loving it!! Will come back again &#8211; taking you feeds also, Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ppc management</title>
		<link>http://www.futuresearches.com/on-page-search-engine-optimization-checklist/comment-page-1/#comment-489</link>
		<dc:creator>ppc management</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 04:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futuresearches.com/?p=183#comment-489</guid>
		<description>The benefit of a search engine friendly website is it has a greater chance of getting sales. Good website structure makes people spends more time on your site and the more vital it turn out to be useful in their mind, the better chances that they will purchase your product or services. The endeavor of every website ought to earn good volume of traffic and will convert visitors into potential customers and a search engine friendly development will be a big help for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The benefit of a search engine friendly website is it has a greater chance of getting sales. Good website structure makes people spends more time on your site and the more vital it turn out to be useful in their mind, the better chances that they will purchase your product or services. The endeavor of every website ought to earn good volume of traffic and will convert visitors into potential customers and a search engine friendly development will be a big help for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Future Searches</title>
		<link>http://www.futuresearches.com/on-page-search-engine-optimization-checklist/comment-page-1/#comment-485</link>
		<dc:creator>Future Searches</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futuresearches.com/?p=183#comment-485</guid>
		<description>Good question. There are contrary opinions about the use of strong and bold tags.  All I know is Matt Cutts mentioned on his blog that Google likes bold tag more that strong tag (maybe because it is shorter) but in terms of semantic search, strong tag might gain importance in the future I guess. I would recommend using bold tag anyway and make sure you don&#039;t use it just for your targetted keywords and look spammy. Any ideas on this issue anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question. There are contrary opinions about the use of strong and bold tags.  All I know is Matt Cutts mentioned on his blog that Google likes bold tag more that strong tag (maybe because it is shorter) but in terms of semantic search, strong tag might gain importance in the future I guess. I would recommend using bold tag anyway and make sure you don&#8217;t use it just for your targetted keywords and look spammy. Any ideas on this issue anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amelia Vargo</title>
		<link>http://www.futuresearches.com/on-page-search-engine-optimization-checklist/comment-page-1/#comment-484</link>
		<dc:creator>Amelia Vargo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 07:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futuresearches.com/?p=183#comment-484</guid>
		<description>Sorry it too the code seriously - I mean the strong tag</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry it too the code seriously &#8211; I mean the strong tag</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amelia Vargo</title>
		<link>http://www.futuresearches.com/on-page-search-engine-optimization-checklist/comment-page-1/#comment-483</link>
		<dc:creator>Amelia Vargo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 07:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futuresearches.com/?p=183#comment-483</guid>
		<description>What about using the &lt;strong&gt; tag and &lt;em&gt; tag for keywords - do you think that makes a difference?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about using the <strong> tag and <em> tag for keywords &#8211; do you think that makes a difference?</em></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

